Your Ad Here
0 Plus Temp Mail Service 777 Store Service
顯示具有 Should 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Should 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2011年6月16日 星期四

Should We Legalize Performance-Enhancing Drugs In Tennis-Sports?


In the last 25 years the challenges presented by performance enhancing drugs in sports and the inadequacy of the drug testing agencies to deal with it, has come to a point that even high ranked officials are venting their frustration.

"There's definitely a performance-enhancing effect if you use things that improve oxygen transport to the tissue," says Larry Bowers, an expert on athletic drug testing and senior managing director of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency. He says anonymous surveys of athletes indicate that only a tenth of them use performance-enhancing drugs. But he acknowledges that doped Athletes may win most of the time."

"Charles Yesalis, an epidemiology professor at Pennsylvania State University who has written extensively on the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sport over the past 23 years, believes a "large percentage" of record-holders probably doped their way to the finish line. "A lot of experts, at least in private, feel that way," he says."

"Yesalis maintains that drug testing, as practiced at past games, has been a "farce." "Just because of my own value system, I have never seriously entertained legalizing drugs," says Yesalis. "But the stench of the hypocrisy is starting to outweigh my hesitation to just throw up my hands and say, 'Let everybody do whatever they want.'" Performance Drugs Outrun The Olympics - Matthew Herper, 02.15.02, 12:00 PM ET Forbes.com

As Charles Yesalis, of the US. Anti-Doping Agency, I feel like saying "'Let everybody do whatever they want.'", but perhaps it would be the wrong signal, so let us analyse, what might happen if performance-enhancing drugs were legalized for professional athletes:

- Young people would get the wrong message.

- Our general anti drugs laws would not make any sense because; athletes are users and abusers of illegal drugs such as;

Amphetamines, Diuretics, Growth hormone, Anabolic Steroids, Cocaine, Coca leaf juice, Cannabis even Monkey Brains and G.O.R.K. (God Only Really Knows)!

- All drugs would have to be legalized!

- We would have a quarter of the world taking speed, a quarter smoking cannabis another quarter snorting cocaine and the rest wondering what to take to look "Normal"! Kidding apart it would be a catastrophe! Or would it be?

- The already existing sports fanatics and wanabe champion dysfunctional and destitute of any talent would start taking drugs

in the hope it would work for them! (Even though it would not work, because you still need to be a pure bread/great athlete

to win.)

- Greedy parents would start pumping their children with all kinds of terrible things. (How naive am I, as if they were not

doing it now?)

- High school coaches of all sports would have a heyday!

"A 2005 survey of high school students across the country by the national Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 4.8 percent had used steroids without a doctor's prescription.

Not that anyone needs a doctor. A 2005 study by monitoring the Future, a federally funded research organization, found that nearly 40 percent of high school seniors said steroids were "fairly easy" or "very easy" to acquire." Impact of steroids felt across high school sports C.W. Nevius Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - San Francisco Chronicle

So if; At the Sydney Games, out of almost 3000 athletes tested, some 80 per cent of them admitted to taking at least one ‘legal’ drug or supplement. Over 500 admitted to taking more than five. It is clear that the ‘medicalisation’ of human performance, at least at the Olympics, means that sport could not, ironically, exist without drugs whether they are ‘legal’ or not." Drugs in sport - a bitter pill to swallow Fri, Dec 8, 06 16:15

''No one wants to see me put the shot 65 feet or throw the discus 200 feet, and the only way I can make a big throw is to use steroids.'' He said the competition would still be legitimate because he said 80 percent to 90 percent of the athletes he would face were using steroids. VIEWS OF SPORT; Liberate Track and Field From Steroids VIEWS OF SPORT; By EDWIN MOSES

Nicolas Escude former ATP player (Career High ATP Ranking - Singles: 17 (26-Jun-2000) at the French open 2002. In Paris, French Davis Cup player Escude said: "To say that tennis today is clean, you have to be living in a dream world." By Piers Newbery - BBC Sport Online at Wimbledon Friday, 28 June, 2002, 17:05 GMT 18:05 UK

Now the case for making it legal for professional athletes to take drugs:

- If the estimate is that around the 80% of the Athletes use some sort of performance enhancing substance, there is a strong case for legalization!

- Performance enhancing drugs should be legal for professional athletes only and above the age of 18 years old.

- Laws should be made to protect non-professional athletes and youngsters - No Tolerance on use or abuse.

- No tolerance for the use of performance enhancing drugs for non-professional until the age of 18 years old!

- Doctors and Medicine Sports Centres should be responsible for the Athletes medication.

- The Athletes and Doctors and labs should take full responsibility for their own decisions.

- Coaches should stay completely out of the equation, the professionals on the field; Doctors, Scientists and Labs should be the only ones making decisions with the Athletes.

There are a lot more issues, but to make this article shorter we have to understand that, the general public is well aware of what is going on and so do officials, sponsors and governments. There is too much money involved, billions and billions of dollars; we are no longer in the "Pierre de Coubertin" era. It is time for a change and everyone will feel better with the situation, the IOC, the governing bodies, the testing sites and the Athletes themselves.

Why are we then continuing this charade? Keeping on saying that our sports are clean when in any given Olympic games more than 8O% of the Athletes are "sick" or asthmatic, or have liver, heart or lung problems in order to be prescribed "legal" (Illegal) drugs and compete! And when almost every week there is a report about drug use by professional Athletes!

Remember in my last article; - "SYDNEY, Australia (AP) -- John McEnroe has reportedly admitted he unknowingly took steroids during his tennis career.

"For six years I was unaware I was being given a form of steroid of the legal kind they used to give horses until they decided it was too strong even for horses," McEnroe was quoted as saying in The Daily Telegraph newspaper in Sydney on Monday." [http://www.cnn.com/2004/SPORT/01/11/mcenroe.steroids.ap/] - CNN WORLD SPORTS Sunday, January 11, 2004 Posted: 8:52 PM EST (0152 GMT)

...and the ATP, the ITF and whoever else tests the players did not detect "HORSE DOSES of Steroids" in John McEnroe's urine or blood tests? Definitely, "They cannot be serious!"

"In his book ''You Cannot Be Serious'', McEnroe said he suspected that steroids and amphetamines had made their way into the top levels of the sport in the 80's. " Why were steroids or amphetamines not detected on other players either, that is if players were tested at all?

The excuse, "the tennis authorities were testing for recreational drugs only", oh!...and cocaine apparently stays in your body for the rest of your life in the roots of your hair. How come cocaine was never detected in any of the possible suspected culprits in the Tennis Tour then? Or is this a case of the whole world being "stupid" and these organizations know better?

We could go on and on citing more and more questionable actions by officialdom to no avail. The crux of all of this is; "Should we legalize performance-enhancing drugs in tennis/sports?" As much as I hate to say it, to bring this absurd hypocritical charade to an end, my answer is a redundant yes!








Your opinion is very much appreciated, please go to my website and vote, yes or no, the results will be there for everyone to see.

For quick access to all links to the referenced articles please go to http://www.tenniscruz.com

Copyright © Tenniscruz.com®. All rights reserved.


2011年4月7日 星期四

Tap water Vs bottled water-we should bottle the tap or tap on the bottle? Oy much! I need a Drink!


Is tap water cleaner than bottled water? Most people will probably say "no". After all, you get flyers from your water utility with images of snow-capped mountains and streams of water gurgling over rocks in flowing crystal clear pools, through the wires? NaH, you receive only one Bill of materials (BOM). So, let us remove the placing on the bunk and tally some comparison points.

In Cleveland, Ohio, researchers took tap water samples from four processors and compared them with five types of bottled water.

1. If the tooth decay is a concern, bottle of water fluoride test failed with only 5% falls within the recommended range. Tap water was okay. Pressure, 1 point.

Tap water is regulated by the environmental protection (EPA) and they require enough chlorine is added to water to kill all bacteria.

Bottled water, if the source is often from the tap (see label for Pepsi's Aquafina) are regulated by the food and Drug Administration (FDA) and allows bottlers some contamination of e. coli or fecal coliform. Ewww! Waste Water! Yuck! Ptooey!

2. While neither result is acceptable, the results reflect differences in the regulation. Two thirds of the bottle of water had lower bacterial counts than tap water samples, but 25 percent of the bottled water had 10 times more bacteria than tap water. Pressure, 2 points.

3. lead leaching from supply pipes or fixtures can be a great concern for tap-water users, provision should be made for bottled water is sealed and remains unchanged after processing. Bottle, 1 point.

Chlorine, the mandate of the EPA, is a poison that turns into a class of the carcinogenic chemical substances in the presence of organic materials. These carcinogenic substances have been directly linked to heart disease and cancer.

4. Risk from chlorine, together with the water foul taste and smell, is the main reason why most people prefer bottled water vs tap water. Bottled, 2 points.

EPA and FDA have uniform standards for acceptable levels of medicines . The Nohave.

Some water utilities test for a few drugs, but none is removed.

None of the bottlers test their final product for drugs (as I know), but some have filtering processes, which would remove some medicines.

After the recent events on Wall Street, I have full confidence in our Government and Wall Street will require testing for medicines in our water supply , when we all has long flowing beard, high voices and growing a few extra body parts.

5. bottle of water will have an edge here, because some bottlers use filter systems, which removes some medicines. Bottled, 3 points.

The same filters, but remove trace minerals such as calcium, magnesium and potassium, essential to good health. If these minerals have been added back, is the water flat wine tasting and unhealthy to drink.

Unhealthy because water is slightly acidic, and when we consume an acid substance, our bodies will take calcium from our teeth and bones to produce bicarbonate to neutralize acid.

6. in the light of the above comments regarding the minerals and the fact that different studies suggest cancer can only grow in an acidic environment, it is a second point to tap water. Pressure, 3 points.

United States producing 70 million empty plastic water bottles every day using enough oil for one year in order to keep 100,000 cars on the roads. Landfills are overwhelmed with these bottles. It is estimated that 60 million over going to landfills each day.

7. Add in eco-costs for manufacturing, trucking, shelving and the placing on the market, and it is a second point to tap water. Pressure, 4 points.

Major oil companies buying oil lease from our Government, to explore for oil, drilling, pumping, transport to refineries, refine, store, transport to petrol stations, pay large taxes and provide a reliable product for less than $ 5.00 a gallon.

Bottle of water people, turn on a tap, filter water (perhaps), fill the bottle, take it to the store, pay taxes, and delivering a questionable product to a very high price.

8. the Cheapest bottle of water I found in the shop today was $ 4.82, on the basis of per gallon! Pressure, 5 points.

Okay, this small competition winner tap 5 to 3.

That said, I will deliberately drinking tap water. Why?

Go read the number 4 again, and the section above it.

I spend most of my day reading and writing about what is in our water, and what it does to us, and in my opinion, the chlorine in tap water is the primary cause of heart disease and cancer in the world today.

I filter my tap water before I use it. I want to use the bottle of water in an emergency, but it is expensive and too "iffy" to count. I bottle my own!

Filter your tap water before you use it and bottle your own water. In this way you know you have good, safe, water at a penny per glass, not five dollars or more a gallon.








David Eastham is a passionate advocate for good, safe water and home water filters researcher. Visit the his now at http://www.Good -Safe-Water.com to discover which brand of drinking water filters David recommends after extensive comparison.


2011年1月30日 星期日

Should you buy pharmaceutical grade fish oil class?


If you were attracted by pharmaceutical research term grade fish oil, you will be surprised to find out what is actually just a marketing campaign. This is because the mandate was to think of a man or a fabricant who made it for products purchased on another product available. In industry, there is no single organizations, controle agrees, tests, validate you out certifications for many fish oil companies that had fabriques. So this is not true pharmaceutical grade for grade term.

If you have a product ont achete-pharmaceutical grade fish oil, then only an implicite sens, see products and more free of toxines. Companies that make use of the purification process known as distillation moleculaire admit this complex process not remove all the toxines and metals are from fish. So, there is a small amount of toxines in fish, but in a fairly innocuous.

They are also a few other companies that claim they pharmaceutical research there was oil fish class since it contains a enteric coating on pills mouth, Malheureusement, but there are several drugs that could have a reduced effectiveness of une acide environment sales come with them. And addiction, there are some composants scenario of what would go away.

It would be better to conduct a thorough research on different types of products can be bought in the market before deciding which one to do. To do this, you can use a number of review which can be found all over the Internet. To get more pharmaceutical research on oil fish class visit.








Here you may download a copy of take me five-part report on pharmaceutical grade fish oil to all families. I will also tell you what make I personally choose, with some great which you need. Stop by http://www.omega-3-supplement-review.com for more information, today!


2011年1月17日 星期一

Some types of alcohol test you need to know


Alcohol test is usually performed by police officers for the determination of the BAC (blood alcohol content). There are some ways that are used for doing alcohol testing. The following presents some of them.

Field sobriety tests

Field sobriety testing are some methods that are used to authenticate drunkenness. There are some basic tests person that must be performed. The tests usually include hand-eye coordination and response time. In General, these tests include legged stand, walk a straight line, as well as turning around. In addition, it also includes horizontal gaze nystagmus test that questions the people to focus on the object that is placed between 12 and 15 inches.

Urine testing

It is another common thing for testing of the alcohol. However, it is limited to the detection of the use of recent alcohol. Using this method, the user has the possibility of cheating by smuggling from the urine of their friend to the test Chamber. It is able to offer you a very accurate measurement, as long as it is carried out not more than a week after use. This kind of testing you can also order a different substance abuse excluding alcohol.

Saliva testing

This test can only be used for the measurement of alcohol after one or two days of use. It also costs more expensive than urine testing. Instead, it can also be used for the control of drug abuse. However, these tests is usually preferred because it personally less invasive than urine.

Hair testing

This test is able to offer you a more accurate test in a longer period of time. In comparison with another lab test method, cost, the more expensive. The measurement of this test includes the absorption levels of EtG and FAEE in the hair of the test-taker. When the bloodstream of the person contains alcohol, the EtG and FAEE on the hair to be absorbed.

Breathalyzers

Another most popular testing the alcohol is using ask breathalyzer test. It is very practical to use because it is portable and provides you with instant results. It is ideal to be used for emergency employees or agents. However, the result of this device is varied from 15% to 23% of the actual BAC. This is caused the alcohol is measured fit into the alveoli air bags when the blood vessels in the lungs.








In addition, breathalyzers sound for home or personal use. You can direct the alcohol in your blood measure by yourself. There are a few options of ask breathalyzer test that you can have for you including ask breathalyzer test keychains, as well as portable breathalyzers. You can get these devices where you deal with.


2011年1月16日 星期日

Drug-addiction-you must test your teen?


Not only can drug testing of your teenager discovering addictions, it can also prevent drug use. If your teen a good excuse for not doing drugs, they will be able to curb the peer pressure on them by friends and acquaintances when badgered to doing drugs.

Cheap Home test deliveries have set the stage for parents no longer wonder if their kids are experimenting with drugs. The age old dilemma has been or to interfere in the Affairs of your children or not. Now there is an out for your children. They may say "Hey, I'm not going to do drugs, I am under routine tests and my future is also important for me." Previously, all the peer pressure was at the children and they had no deterrent effect (excuse) to be able to say no.

Many of us look back and say that our lives would have been much easier and better as the requirement to have a car, was that routine and random drug tests were passed. Most teenagers would stay clean from drugs when they are not the use of a car, or had their own car! The use of random drug testing can be the thing that your kids alive and out of prison.

Most teenagers do not realize the debilitating factor those drugs on the learning ability. They don't realize that when they start doing drugs, not just their qualities, but their ability to learn also deteriorates. In the long term also hurt their feelings as you do now, it will help for the rest of their lives. When they are children of their own, they will look back and be thankful that you set to a way for them to use, to be able to say no.

Although the teen can seem to think and you claim that his interference in the business. And Yes you are, you are the parent, but at the same time you set them with borders and tools in the fight against the pressure that most teenagers on drugs begins.

Most parents are reluctant to talk of drugs with their children, and avoid the topic. The talk about drugs and how to avoid peer pressure, along with the limits and escaped (test) that you put in the place Gets the teen the ammo to fight peer pressure. Gives you enough about your children to speak of drugs with them? In any case have a cheap drug testing laying around, so they have the excuse to say no!








If you want to know more about cocaine relief, my free e-book "Cocaine Relief-first step" here download: free e-book. Jim has overcome addictions and see it from the user point of view, find out more on http://www.cocainerelief.com:


2010年12月6日 星期一

I do need to worry about passing a drug test.


Pass took the substance or to the topic of employment drug testing study recently used drugs or the most well known false positive that creates a result. Up of the stay away from people who do not is the easiest way to know to pass drug tests of specific drugs. Only that you should know about if it is not optional, however, pass a drug test.

It is important to know you can't cheat drug tests first, really. Products to help the people hit the drug tests there, but they are mainly effect is no. In fact, only the large amounts of water intake and output, urine body faster Flash is required for most of these products is somewhat effective rendered. If you have recently used drugs, drugs by the positive anywhere in few month testable, mind you.

Employer's drug test positive for false official test, this is very low. Is likely to view the test drug detection and the people who use drugs in the same room as you have been blood and urine that same way. Not recommended for various reasons, but it work drug tests fail not. Foods such as poppy seeds that is rumored to cause false positive drug tests in second is faintly also show, much larger than ripping to consume large amounts of you people actually. Takes all the drugs that certain drugs can create false positive, drug testing companies almost always complete evaluation and drug tests before it to prevent use.

Is the only way to pass a drug test if you are using drugs, you can identify your body time to completely, intake of substances without the metabolism so. Stay long in any drug, system and metabolism depends on as how drug use and usage. Also plays the age, size, and will be eliminated from the body and general health, drugs take big factors.

Rely on how recently have done only concrete answer medication and to question whether or not to pass a drug test from the employer. Home drug test kits are detected on the system level of the drug is relieved available are available to help find what. These tests is a fast, accurate, and confidential.








Market is more medical home test kits today. If you need one, or someone know ever is. Considering the confidentiality, accuracy, and a fair price in the following three points. FDA will verify good online home test kit for medical use only approved (or off), a reputable Web site has moved.

Lila Abrams in MedicalHomeTesting.com owner. She is the mother of three, and the pharmaceutical business, have been in the past 20 years. Leila and her partner, patient safety, health, and their dedication to quality happy, trust, knowledge and services to make commits.